Construction World May 2019

It is nearly universally accepted that good infrastructure has significant benefits for the economy and peoples’ quality of life. South Africa currently has a predicted annual infrastructure spend of USD50-billion a year by 2030. SA TO FACE UNEXPECTED BILL FOR POOR INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

H owever, we have a significant problem. According to Mace’s new report, up to 80% of large infrastructure projects are delivered late and over-budget – and then under-deliver on benefits. This has a substantial cost to taxpayers. Modelling done by Mace, the consultancy and construction company behind iconic projects such as the Zeitz MOCAA in Cape Town, the London 2012 Olympics and Dubai Expo 2020, shows that if major projects continue to experience issues at the rate they do now taxpayers will be faced with an unexpected bill of R205-billion every year by 2030. The new Mace Insights report released recently, A blueprint for modern infrastructure delivery¸ looks at the main reasons why so many large projects go wrong and what we can do to put it right. Nearly 40 senior executives from around the world were interviewed for the breakthrough report alongside a review of latest academic literature and new modelling. Some of the main issues identified include: • Lack of clarity of outcome when deciding on which schemes to take forward. Often decisions are driven by political pressure rather than rigorous cost and benefit analysis. • The poor predictive abilities of project teams in their early stages, who are pressured into providing fixed point price estimates and programmes well before accurate predictions are possible or realistic. • Procurements based on ‘cheapest price’ rather than ‘value’. On large and complex projects, cheapest price procurement is a false economy. In South Africa, Mace and MMQSMace deliver project management, programme management and cost consultancy for some of the country’s largest and most high-profile developers. Completed projects include a range of projects for the V&A Waterfront, a number of different mining companies, retail bank rollouts and the refurbishment and upgrade of Park Station Johannesburg. Drawn from the report, our top solutions for addressing concerns with South African infrastructure are: Create a department for growth In many countries around the world, the political responsibility for planning, business regulation, housing and transport are separate. This means that when a mega infrastructure project comes along it cuts across multiple policy areas with a very wide range of stakeholders. Bringing the relevant elements together into a

coherent single government department would improve decision- making and efficiency. Create an independent scrutiny panel If your project or programme is large enough or you are a government agency with many large projects you should create a panel of industry ‘heavyweights’ outside normal public sector structures to challenge the project scope, timescales and costs. Their sole role should be rigorous challenge. This independent scrutiny panel needs to have the teeth and executive support to get the information they need for proper challenge. The London 2012 Olympics and the Hong Kong Aviation Authority both took this approach. Governments may choose to use this panel to challenge their top 10, 20 or 50 projects at regular intervals. Training academy for project ‘sponsors’ and leaders Many large infrastructure owners are public bodies who can struggle to attract the right calibre of people to work for them due to pay constraints. Hence it makes sense to provide high-quality practical training to current government employees to try and upskill them and enhance their skills. A particular focus should be given to the understanding of probability and risk and what that means to a project alongside how to hone in on a clear outcome for a project to achieve.  Kelvin Byres , South Africa Country Manager, said: “The delivery of infrastructure in South Africa is key to continue to enable economic growth across the country. As population pressures on our urban centres grow, we must keep pace with our infrastructure programmes. “The Government rightly has ambitious plans for infrastructure investment across South Africa, but if we can’t deliver them effectively we risk huge costs for our taxpayers.” Jason Millett , Chief Operating Officer for Consultancy at Mace said: “According to our calculations, unless something changes South African taxpayers will be stung with an unexpected bill of R205-billion a year by 2030. “Sadly, many large infrastructure projects do not have the right measures in place to properly plan, develop and deliver these vital schemes. This leads to cost increases, delays in completion and under delivering on the benefits they promised.

11

CONSTRUCTION WORLD MAY 2019