Mechanical Technology February 2015

⎪ Comment ⎪

P U B L I C A T I O N S CR O WN

I write this on another day of Stage 2 load shedding – due to “a shortage of generation capacity as additional units have had to be taken out of service for unplanned maintenance due to technical faults,” says the Eskom statement. More specifically, it continues, “in the morning we mentioned that Majuba Power Station’s Unit 3, Duvha’s Unit 2 and Koeberg’s Reliability, maintenance and culture change

www.crown.co.za P U B L I C A T I O N S CR O WN

P U B L I C A T I O N S CR O WN

Published monthly by Crown Publications cc Crown House Cnr Theunis and Sovereign Streets Bedford Gardens 2007 PO Box 140 Bedfordview 2008

2015CROWN LOGO february.indd 1

2015/02/10 01:17:09PM

Unit 1 are on unplanned maintenance. Now we have two more units that have had to be taken off service. At the Kriel Power Station, Unit 3 experienced a boiler tube leak, and Camden’s Unit 4 has a generator hydrogen leak.” Am I excessively cynical or has the phrase ‘technical fault’ suddenly become a blame shifter? An Eskom tweet posted at 13:02 on Wednesday, February 4 reads “load shedding will move into Stage 2 from 14h00. This is as a result of power station units not returning to service as planned.” Is this a reference to planned maintenance over running or unplanned maintenance taking longer than expected? And how cool does the utility think it is to explain itself via Twitter? Eskom CEO Tshediso Matona, speaking last month at an emergency press briefing, said, “Eskom has reached a point that does not allow us to ignore the health of our plants.” When, I ask, did it ever become acceptable to ignore the health of plants? Mechanical Technology has published a maintenance feature for as long as I can remember – the feature certainly predates my involvement in the magazine. In that time, we have consistently and proudly advocated the shift towards condition monitoring and preventative and proactive approaches, to maximise uptime and equipment life. I am convinced that few responsible engineers – including those working for Eskom – would argue against the importance of responsible maintenance approaches. Yet here we are, in a situation where a critical national asset is near breaking point owing to neglect. As from this month’s issue, we have invited Mario Kuisis of Martec to submit a column for our proactive maintenance, lubrication and contamination management feature. We look forward to this becoming a quarterly feature. Martec describes itself as “a reliability enhancement specialist” and in his opening column Kuisis points towards five basic approaches to maintenance – passive, reactive, preventative, predictive and proactive – all of which have their proper place depending on the risk, impact and cost of the component or machine breakdown. Kuisis points towards the different approaches used for component breakdown on a car: passive for a headlamp failure, because you can always replace it in the morning; reactive for punctures – we keep a spare for use when we get stranded. We change the engine oil regularly because we know that this will prevent premature engine failure and we monitor the engine oil pressure and temperature, because the engine can be destroyed if we fail to pick up a lubrication or overheating problem. But, in spite of the numerous examples of good maintenance practices and technologies, not all vehicle owners treat their assets with respect. In the context of taking care of expensive materials handling equipment such as bucket wheel excavators, Flip Winkel of indurad points out in this month’s innovative engineering feature that “when you buy a modern car, you get an automatic park assist system based on a proximity sensor to help you position your car safely. But on R500-million bucket wheel excavators there are seldom any operator-assist features incorporated into the design”. Are we really that desperate to secure the least possible price? Are we willing to take more risks with our critical industrial and infrastructure assets than we are with our own personal vehicles? In our cover story this month, Fritz Fourie and David Main outline Hansen Transmissions’ global drive towards culture change. The group has adopted the KATA philosophy associated with Toyota’s success. Main says: “KATA is about continual improvement. In the context of an organisation, it is about reinforcing and repeating the things that are done well and identifying areas of weakness.” We have a skills shortage in South Africa that is, undoubtedly, affecting our ability to maintain our assets. More importantly, we seem to have lost the simple old-fashioned value of looking after our property. At our power plants and within our water, road, rail and building infrastructures, a culture change is desperately needed. Maintenance is not about fixing ‘technical faults’. Its meaning should be taken from the dictionary – preservation, conservation, continuation, continuance, continuity, keeping up, carrying on, prolongation and perpetuation – and applied literally. While advanced maintenance technologies are available, as are appropriately skilled people if maintenance service providers are taken into account, KATA-type philosophies and a culture change are essential if we are to restore reliability and credibility to our critical infrastructure plants and organisations. The current Eskom crisis brings this need into stark focus. Peter Middleton

Tel: +27 11 622 4770 Fax: +27 11 615 6108 e-mail: mechanical@crown.co.za

Editor: Peter Middleton

Copy editor: Erika van Zyl

Advertising: Norman Welthagen e-mail: normanw@crown.co.za

Design & layout: Darryl James

Publisher: Karen Grant

Director: Jenny Warwick

Circulation: Karen Smith

Reader enquiries: Radha Naidoo

The views expressed in this journal are not necessarily those of the publisher or the editor.

Transparency You Can See Average circulation (July–September 2014) 3 725

Printed by: Tandym Print – Cape Town

Mechanical Technology — February 2015

1